OC Jewish Experience

The official blog of Jewish Orange County


It has been a while since I’ve posted in this space and my return is timed with the following letter that was sent to me by email this today.  It is from Shalom Elcott, President of Jewish Federation & Family Services.

As we informed you last June, the UCI administration suspended the Muslim Student Union (MSU) and took disciplinary action against the students who participated in the organized disruption of Ambassador Oren’s talk at UCI in February 2010. At that time, we wrote that “we commend the University for this judicious decision in support of free speech and civil discourse…”

Last Friday, the Orange County District Attorney announced that the 11 students arrested at the Oren event were charged with conspiring to disrupt the speech.  The students will be arraigned on March 11th on several misdemeanor counts, and if convicted, could be subject to fines, probation through community service or a jail sentence.

“This case is being filed because there was an organized attempt to squelch the speaker, who was invited to speak to a group at UCI,” District Attorney Tony Rackauckas said in a statement. “These defendants meant to stop this speech and stop anyone else from hearing his ideas, and they did so by disrupting a lawful meeting. This is a clear violation of the law and failing to bring charges against this conduct would amount to a failure to uphold the Constitution.”

So, are criminal charges excessive or warranted?

The disposition of this case is a matter outside of the authority of Jewish Federation & Family Services.   The UCI administration took action according to its charter and its regulations.  The Office of the DA has taken action according to its reading of the Constitution and the laws of the State of California.

We believe that the actions of both the UCI administration and the District Attorney send a strong message to this community — indeed to all communities — that civility must be safeguarded.   We recognize that colleges and universities have always been environments in which difficult (and sometimes confrontational) dialogues take place.  Yet we also believe that if planned, rogue disruptions are allowed to continue without consequences, we will have accomplished nothing despite our best efforts.

Consider this:  At no point in this year-long process has the MSU, its students, attorneys or representatives acknowledged any wrongdoing.  In fact, they have continued to deny it.  There have been no statements of apology or contrition.  Not once has there been an effort, on their part, to reach out and say “We’re sorry.  We blew it.  We’ll do it differently next time.  Let’s talk.”

Consider this as well:  What happened at UCI last February is happening around the country as part of an organized “BDS” (Boycott, Divest, Sanction) movement against the legitimacy of Israel and self-determination of the Jewish people.

We say: let this be a teachable moment for all of us!  While the legal process takes its course, let us think about how we can pursue actions for positive change and an improved campus climate.  How we can bring more partners together – both Jews and people of other faiths – to strengthen and improve the student experience at UCI?

The role we play, as community catalyst and convener, is that of bridge-builder.  We seek to build bridges of interfaith understanding, collaboration and respect, on campus and in the community.  Bridges are built when people of differing viewpoints come together in an atmosphere of mutual respect.  When civility is lacking on one side, the bridge crosses only half the river, and we remain apart.

Shabbat Shalom.

Shalom C. Elcott
President and Chief Executive Officer
Jewish Federation & Family Services


February 11, 2011 - Posted by | Jewish Federation Orange County, Muslim Student Union, UC Irvine | , , , , , , , , , , , ,


  1. I was present that evening when
    Ambassador Oren spoke. It was humiliating for him being disrupted so maany times. But he did speak and his speach was breathtaking.
    I admire the University for the act they took. Rose Glasser

    Comment by Rose Glasser | February 11, 2011 | Reply

  2. “We believe that the actions of both the UCI administration and the District Attorney send a strong message to this community – indeed to all communities — that civility must be safeguarded.”

    Immediately after being suspended by UCI Administration, the UCI MSU turned right around and renamed the organization as “Alkalima, the Muslim Experience at UCI”. One of Alkalima’s first events was to host an anti-Israel speaker, Ben White.

    There was no “strong message” received by the extremist Muslims on campus. While crying wolf, they thumbed their noses at the university.

    Get real.

    Comment by theschles | February 11, 2011 | Reply

  3. “So, are criminal charges excessive or warranted?”

    I don’t know how anyone can determine this. As far I know the university has never disclosed what form of discipline was levied on the students. We only know the MSU was suspended for one quarter and has been put on probation.

    100 UC Irvine professors have said the punishment has been sufficient, but I still would like to know what form of discipline the students were given and if they learned from it and now show remorse and acknowledge their tactics were wrong.

    Also, we do not even know if the students will be found guilty of the criminal charges and do not know what penalty will be sought by the prosecutor.

    If convicted, I would support community service as a punishment. I think jail time would be excessive.

    Some action was required to restore order and deter students or other groups from using tyranny to stifle the rights of free speech at a lawful event. Did the university sanction the students in a manner that will deter other students from using the same tactics?

    Have any of the students apologized to the people who attended the lecture? Have any of the students apologized to the speaker whose rights of free speech were violated? Have the students learned anything from this incident or do they still sincerely believe that they held a legitimate form of peaceful protest and they were merely exercising their protected rights of free speech?

    Comment by Peter an Ex-Eater | February 11, 2011 | Reply

    • Hi Peter,

      “Did the university sanction the students in a manner that will deter other students from using the same tactics?”

      I doubt it. The strongest charge against the MSU was the rule regarding furnishing false information — the MSU lied to the UCI administrators who were investigating the situation. Now they know: if they’re going to disrupt an event, they just need to come out straight and say “yes we planned it all along”.

      In addition, the simple name change to Alkalima got around the MSU’s suspension.

      The only tangible UCI punishment was community service, and if they did the service for an Islamic center of any sort, I would bet they’re happy as charity is one of the five pillars of Islam.

      Comment by theschles | February 11, 2011 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: